![]() E-mail permission messages are acceptable.įollow this link for further information on the review process and how editors make decisions.Īfter acceptance, a copy editor may make changes to the manuscript so that it is readable and clear to those outside the field, and so that papers conform to our style. If the manuscript includes personal communications, please provide a written statement of permission from any person who is quoted. If an author has subsequently moved, the current address may also be stated. The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was done. ![]() If a related manuscript is submitted elsewhere while the manuscript is under consideration at Nature Communications, a copy of the related manuscript must be sent to the editor. The authors must include copies of all related manuscripts with any overlap in authorship that are under consideration or in press elsewhere. (Abstracts or unrefereed web preprints do not compromise novelty). Submission to Nature Communications is taken to imply that there is no significant overlap between the submitted manuscript and any other papers from the same authors under consideration or in press elsewhere. Editorial and publishing policiesīefore a manuscript is submitted, please review our journal policies, and ensure that the submission complies with our policy requirements. Please do not submit revisions as new manuscripts. In addition, reviewers can access the manuscript online, which speeds up the review process. Revised manuscripts should be uploaded via the link provided in the editor's decision letter. Using this system, authors can upload manuscript files (text, figures, videos) directly to our office and check on the status of their manuscripts during the review process. Hope this helps.Owing to the volume of manuscripts we receive, all submissions need to be made via our online submission system. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about a delay in the decision on a revised manuscript?.What does the status “under consideration” mean?.Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses.If there is no change after that, you could politely inquire via email about the status, mentioning your concerns about no change in the status. We would recommend waiting for about a week or two. Glitches in the system at the journal’s end could be another possibility. You might also want to check what the different statuses displayed by the journal are, e.g., does it specify “peer reviewer assigned,” “peer review complete,” etc., as separate steps? The following resource provides insights into manuscript status tracking: Tracking your manuscript status in journal submission systemsįurther, please note that the manuscript status might not always be updated instantly. If the manuscript status has been showing “under consideration” for a long time, there are a couple of possibilities: reviewers might be getting shortlisted, reviewers may not have been invited yet, or invited reviewers may not have accepted the invitation. Perhaps, the subject editor assigned requires more time for assessing the manuscript. It appears that your manuscript might have passed the initial screening for basic requirements by the handling editor. In the case of a desk rejection, authors are notified within the first few days.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |